On 7 November 2026 we read the published price pages of fourteen aesthetic clinics in Glasgow and Greater Glasgow and wrote down what each one states. Every figure below was taken from a page on that clinic's own domain. No directory, aggregator, review site or deal site was used, nothing was estimated, and nothing was averaged.
We expected to find clinics keeping their prices hidden. That is not what the reading shows. All fourteen publish at least one treatment price. The finding is a different one, and it is more awkward for a patient: a published price is very hard to compare with the published price next to it.
This is a record of what is on those pages, not a league table. No clinic is named here, none is ranked, and none is criticised. Our own prices sit in full on the Luxe Skin price guide, which is the only reason we think the question is a fair one for us to ask.
What was read, and how
Fourteen clinics across Glasgow and the surrounding towns, including Bearsden, Giffnock, Clarkston and Thornliebank. For each one we recorded the price page, the date it was read, the figure stated for one area of anti-wrinkle injections, the figure stated for a millilitre of dermal filler, the figure stated for one session of microneedling, and a note of the exact wording the page uses. Where a page gives no figure for a treatment, that is recorded as no figure rather than filled in from somewhere else.
The underlying rows, with every source page, are kept so that any range on this page can be checked against a clinic's own wording in a minute.
Anti-wrinkle injections: eleven figures, from £130 to £250
Eleven of the fourteen publish a price for one area of anti-wrinkle treatment. The lowest published figure is £130 and the highest is £250, so the top of the range is close to double the bottom.
The three that publish no single area figure are not hiding anything either. One lists multi area packages only. One shows the treatment as starting from £200 without saying what an area costs. One carries no toxin line on its price list at all and shows only a £25 booking deposit on the treatment page.
Two clinics publish two figures for the same single area, set by who performs it: £190 as a headline with £225 beside the medical director and £140 to £160 with an aesthetic practitioner at one, and £210 with an associate doctor against £235 with the named doctor at the other. Both are clear about it. It still means one clinic has more than one published price for one treatment.
Dermal filler: the millilitre is often missing
Eleven of the fourteen publish something at one millilitre for dermal filler, running from £230 to £330. The range is the least interesting part of it.
Seven of those eleven figures are for a named area rather than for a millilitre of filler anywhere on the face, and in nearly every case that area is the lips. Four publish a rate for a millilitre of a named filler product instead, which is a different thing again: on one list a millilitre of one product family is £330 while a millilitre of another is £420, with £440 to £550 when a plastic surgeon performs it.
Three clinics publish no per millilitre rate for filler at all. One prices by syringe without stating the volume, at £250 for the first and £200 for the second. One prices by treatment or by a multi millilitre protocol package at £1,550 to £1,675. One publishes only a £20 filler consultation.
A syringe is not a unit of measurement. Two syringe prices can be the same and hold different amounts of filler, and a patient reading two pages has no way to tell.
Microneedling: one word, several devices, £65 to £300
Eleven clinics publish a price for one session of microneedling, from £65 to £300. That is more than four times, and the reason is not margin. The same word is used for a hand held roller in a beauty room and for a medical pen or a radiofrequency device used by a prescriber.
One clinic makes the gap visible on its own list: £225 for the medical version and £150 with a therapist. Another publishes a single roller treatment at £300. Three publish no microneedling line at all, and one of those lists a radiofrequency microneedling device separately at £850 under its own brand name rather than as microneedling.
Four reasons two published prices do not compare
- The volume is not stated. Filler sold by the syringe, by the treatment or as a package tells you the cost and not the amount.
- The figure belongs to an area, not a unit. A lip price and a per millilitre price look alike on a page and answer different questions.
- The price is tiered by practitioner. The same treatment at the same clinic has more than one published figure depending on who holds the needle.
- One word covers several devices. Microneedling, and to a lesser extent skin tightening, names a category rather than a procedure.
A fifth habit sits underneath all four. The word from appears in front of a large share of these figures, and a price that starts from somewhere has no top.
What is not published
Three of the fourteen publish prices with no street address anywhere on the site, so a patient cannot tell where the treatment happens before enquiring. On one of the fourteen, the prices sit on a third party booking listing where each item is marked valid for one month, which means the figure a patient reads in November is not promised in December.
What to ask, if you are comparing
- For filler, ask how many millilitres the price covers. If the answer is a syringe, ask what the syringe holds.
- Ask whether the figure you have read is for the area you want treated or for a millilitre anywhere.
- Ask who performs the treatment at the price shown, and what the same treatment costs with the other practitioners in the clinic.
- For microneedling, ask which device, and whether it is a roller, a motorised pen or a radiofrequency device.
- Ask what the figure does not include: a review appointment, a top up, a prescription, a consultation fee.
How this record will be kept
This page records one reading, taken on 7 November 2026. Published prices move, pages are rewritten and clinics open and close, so a dated reading is the only kind worth publishing. We intend to read the same pages again on 7 February 2027 and to publish what has changed, including where our own figures have moved. If you are a journalist or a researcher and the underlying rows would be useful, the record is available with every source page attached.
Our own prices are published in full on the price guide, and what sits behind a single treatment figure is set out in our note on Botox prices in Glasgow.
Dr Usman Qureshi (Dr Q) is a leading expert in aesthetic medicine with a 22 year career and a background spanning general practice, including A&E, and 12 years specialising in cosmetic procedures. A University of Glasgow graduate of 2002, he is the innovator behind the signature Q Lift, has performed over 20,000 procedures, and is an international speaker and trainer whose work has featured in Glamour and Harpers Bazaar.
